Is your business truly prepared for tomorrow? For many organizations, the answer is “no,” and the reason often sits right in the server room.
Many organizations are held back by legacy, on-premises systems that slow innovation, inflate costs, and limit scalability. Cloud migration is no longer optional, it is essential for competitiveness.
But moving to the cloud is not just a technical task; the strategy you choose—Rehost, Replatform, or Refactor—determines whether you simply lift old problems to new infrastructure or truly future-proof your applications.
The 7 Rs Framework: Strategic Migration Pathways
The “7 Rs” framework — coined by Gartner Research, expanded by Amazon Web Services (AWS) — provides a roadmap for cloud migration decisions. Each path balances effort, cost, and long-term value:
- Rehost (Lift-and-Shift): Move applications to the cloud as-is. Fast and simple, but carries existing technical debt. Example: migrating a legacy ERP system to reduce on-prem maintenance.
- Relocate: A specialized lift-and-shift for entire virtual machine environments without changing the hypervisor or hardware. Ideal for complex setups needing minimal downtime.
- Replatform (Lift-Tinker-and-Shift): Make targeted updates to leverage cloud services, like moving a database to a managed solution or containerizing apps. Core logic stays intact.
- Refactor (Re-architect): Rebuild apps to be cloud-native with microservices or serverless architectures. Maximizes scalability, agility, and innovation. Example: splitting a monolithic e-commerce platform into independent checkout, catalog, and payment services.
- Repurchase (Drop-and-Shop): Replace an existing app with a cloud-based SaaS solution, such as modern HR or CRM platforms. Reduces maintenance but may require workflow adjustments.
- Retire: Decommission applications that no longer provide value, freeing resources for more strategic initiatives.
- Retain (Revisit): Keep certain applications on-premises temporarily, often due to compliance, data residency, or recent investments that aren’t ready for cloud migration.
This framework helps organizations evaluate every application in their portfolio against business value, technical debt, and migration urgency.
Deep Dive: Rehost, Replatform, and Refactor
For legacy applications, these three strategies involve real architectural decisions that impact long-term ROI and innovation:
A. Rehost (The Quick Move)
- Goal: Achieve rapid cloud adoption to close data centers or avoid hardware renewal costs.
- Scope: Focused on infrastructure; minimal or no code changes.
- Pros: Fastest time-to-cloud; minimal upfront development; low disruption.
- Cons: Technical debt is carried forward; application won’t leverage cloud-native capabilities.
- Best Fit: Non-differentiating or utility applications, such as internal reporting systems, batch processing jobs, or file servers, where speed is more important than optimization.
Example: A financial company with aging on-premises VMs might rehost its document storage system to AWS EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances to reduce maintenance overhead quickly, even if the app still runs the same legacy database.
B. Replatform (The Smart Upgrade)
- Goal: Improve performance and cost efficiency by selectively modernizing key components, without a full rewrite.
- Scope: Targeted code or architecture modifications, like containerizing apps or moving databases to managed cloud services. Core business logic remains intact.
- Pros: Balances effort and value; reduces operational overhead; prepares for eventual refactoring.
- Cons: Requires moderate development planning and effort.
- Best Fit: Stable applications that require modernization to scale, such as web portals, internal HR systems, or customer-facing applications with moderate traffic.
Example: A company may move its self-managed PostgreSQL database to Amazon RDS and containerize the application using Docker. The app continues to function normally but now benefits from automated backups, scaling, and reduced infrastructure management.
C. Refactor (The Complete Transformation)
- Goal: Maximize agility, scalability, and long-term ROI through full cloud-native architecture.
- Scope: Significant code changes, microservices adoption, or serverless deployment. Often involves re-architecting the application entirely.
- Pros: Unlocks full cloud potential; enables rapid feature delivery; future-proofs critical applications.
- Cons: Highest upfront cost and effort; most complex and time-consuming; potential risk during migration.
- Best Fit: Core, differentiating applications critical to business success, such as e-commerce platforms, digital banking apps, or high-traffic SaaS products.
Example: A monolithic e-commerce platform can be refactored into microservices, separating checkout, catalog, and payment services. This allows independent scaling, rapid feature deployment, and seamless integration with cloud-native services like AWS Lambda, S3, and DynamoDB.
Matching Strategy to Business Needs
|
Criterion |
Rehost | Replatform |
Refactor |
| Business Value | Low / Non-differentiating | Moderate / Stable | High / Core Differentiator |
| Urgency / Timeline | Immediate (6 months) | Flexible (12–18 months) | Long-term (18+ months) |
| Required Code Change | 0–5% | 10–25% | 50%+ |
| Future Scalability | Low to Moderate | Moderate | Extremely High |
| Technical Debt Status | Accepted / Managed | Reduced in key areas | Aggressively eliminated |
Cloud migration is more than a technical upgrade—it’s a strategic business decision. The path your organization chooses determines whether you replicate existing challenges or create a foundation for long-term growth, agility, and innovation.
Start by evaluating applications across business value, technical debt, and scalability needs, prioritizing strategies that balance immediate operational improvements with long-term modernization.
Thoughtful planning allows cloud adoption to drive efficiency, reduce complexity, and unlock new opportunities for innovation.